Peer Review Policy

UOCHJRS maintains the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in UOCHJRS undergo full peer review taking into account the following characteristics:

1. UOCHJRS follows the double blind peer review process and each paper is subject to be reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts in the subject areas.
2. All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
3. Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions.
4. Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows UOCHJRS to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.

PEER REVIEW OF REFERRED PAPERS

Editors of UOCHJRS will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviewer’s comments. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.